Comments on: Beware of Static Constructors

By: Emad Alashi

Emad Alashi — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:03:56 +0000

someday it’s gonna see the light enshallah, if only we can buy time! but i admit, we shoud put more effort in this. thanks ibrahim

By: Ibrahim Younis

Ibrahim Younis — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:26:54 +0000

regardless of the needed time to complete this project even if it completed far away form perfection but still you did you best, as they say later better than never, but make to come after all of the waiting.

Gazakm allah Khayran, hope that Allah calculate all of your efforts in you MEZAN 7ASANTKOM.

your brother

By: admin

admin — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:27:46 +0000

Thanks a lot for passing by Lunar, and it’s good that you didn’t fall in the trap i am talking about hehe. teslam

By: LUNAR

LUNAR — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:20:08 +0000

Salam
I came through this once, i needed a hashtable that must be initialized once the class is referenced (only once), so , a superior at my company suggested to use a static constructor, it worked fine with me because i dont need to update this hashtable with a different data each time, initialized once and manipulated as much as i want in other portions of the code.

Great Tip (thumbs UP).